Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Opening night at Rotunda Gallery AUD, Dubai, 11/11/2008








photos by Hannes Brunner and Marcelo G. Lima



Of space and places

by Marcelo Guimaraes Lima


“There are mirrors for the face but none for the mind. Let careful thought serve as a substitute.”

Baltasar Gracian - The Manual Oracle, 1647



Images are coded and travel the world at great speed in the digital dimension. An ever changing IMAGOSPHERE envelops the planet.

A riddle is entered in the search engine’s text field: the response is a series of images on the graphic template on the screen. This graphically composed group of images will be printed, cut and assembled as a box.

The search engine is like a daring, or perhaps an unconcerned fisherman, throwing his net into deep and murky waters, indifferent to the potential risks of every quest, of every search, of every wish, of every human endeavor.

The assembled images reverberate with textual associations: quasi narratives being produced on the screen of the mind, in the cinema of thought. Everybody can see that the machine has a heart, a poetic mind of its own.

The mind-screen is a blank slate, with its compartments, like a table of categories whose definitions and relations however, exist only in that brief time of the interaction between the eye and the screen. It exists, that is, it persists, as remembrance, as traces of things forgotten, the very stuff of poetry.

From the rectangle of the computer screen to the rectangle of the paper, from the visible object in the light field to the reflected light of the plane, a surface. Cutting and pasting the articulated fields, the hinges and divisions of a body. From two-dimensional space to the space of the room: an elementary lesson on basic topology and topography.

The thought-images confront us now as bodies in space. A kaleidoscope of figures with faces both visible and hidden. They are ready to exchange places, to be assembled and reassembled in the contiguous space of a large tabula rasa.

The large white table in the middle of the room is a strategic field. A field of categories yet to be devised in a newly composed table of knowledge that will confront the shifting landscape of our thought processes, of our understanding of the ever changing limits of things, and of our actions.

The riddle of representation is that the “immaterial” needs to inhabit bodies, surfaces, spaces, in order to be understood, conceptualized, transmitted, in short, in order to be. The mind belongs “out there” in the world of things, images, figures.

Printed images are traces, colored shadows on the surface of a paper sheet, a delicate membrane, folded into a geometric body. Mirrored and connected to other boxes, it is an analogue of the material brain: a compact body made of communicating folded surfaces.

Reflecting on these emerging patterns and spatial structures of Hannes Brunner’s installation, we may be allowed to conclude that without the map there is no territory, that the map is indeed the territory.





Sunday, November 16, 2008

Monday, November 10, 2008

in the gallery: spatial strategies




photos Marcelo G. Lima



a textual code





photos Marcelo G. Lima

in the studio












photos by Marcelo G. Lima



The Manual Oracle

“The very truths which concern us most can only be half spoken, but with attention we can grasp the whole meaning."

. . . . . .


“There are mirrors for the face but none for the mind. Let careful thought serve as a substitute.”

. . . . . .



“You imitate the Divine way when you cause men to wonder and watch.”

. . . . . .


Baltasar Gracian, The Manual Oracle and Art of Prudence, 1647


Sunday, November 9, 2008

in the studio












photos by Hannes Brunner



Friday, November 7, 2008

work in progress





photos by Marcelo G. Lima




Thursday, November 6, 2008

in the studio






photos by Hannes Brunner

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

the caravan


photo by Hannes Brunner



a semiotic deviation




INFORMATION , far more than art, is artifact



.

.

.

another paradox of information ?





Why is it so easy to acquire
the solutions of past problems and so difficult to solve current ones?


Marshall McLuhan

source: http://www.marshallmcluhan.com/poster.html


.
.
.


an information paradox

The missing link created far more interest than all the chains and explanations of being.

Marshall McLuhan

source: http://www.marshallmcluhan.com/poster.html

workshop schedule

Workshop with Hannes Brunner
Search Engine’ s Bodily Reply

When:

Nov 5- 10
Daily 8 AM -12 Midnight
Friday- 2 PM - 10 PM

Where:

VC – Caravan

Visual Communication Program
American University in Dubai

a state of affairs

The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially.

Marshall McLuhan

source: http://www.marshallmcluhan.com/poster.html



a question

"Can “digital art” be considered a branch of contemporary art? Since the end of 1960s, modern art has become fundamentally a conceptual activity. That is, beyond conceptualism proper, art came to focus not on medium or techniques but on concepts. How these concepts are executed is either secondary, or simply irrelevant. When an artist asks gallery visitors to complete a questionnaire and then compiles and exhibits statistics (Hans Haacke), takes up a job as a maid in a hotel and documents hotel rooms (Sophie Calle), cooks a meal for gallery visitors (Rirkrit Tiravaniija), presents a found video tape shot by Russian troops in Chechnya (Sergei Bugaev, a.k.a. Africa), the traditional questions of artistic techniques, skills, and media become largely unimportant. As the well-known Russian artist Africa has put it: “the role of modern art is not to uncover a secret but instead to steal it.” Put differently, more and more contemporary artists act as a kind of journalists, researching and presenting various evidence through different media including text, still photographs, video, etc. What matters is the initial idea, a strategy, a procedure, rather than the details of how the findings or documentation are presented.

Of course not all artists today act as journalists – I am simply taking this as the most clear example of the new role of an artist, in contrast to the older roles of artist as craftsman, as the creator of symbols, allegories, and “representations,” etc. In short, a typical contemporary artist who was educated in the last two decades is no longer making paintings, or photographs, or video – instead, s/he is making “projects.” This term appropriately emphasizes that artistic practice has become about organizing agents and forces around a particular idea, goal, or procedure. It is no longer about a single person crafting unique objects in a particular media.

(Of course contemporary art is also characterized by a fundamental paradox – what collectors collect are exactly such old-fashioned objects rather than “projects.” Indeed, artists selling their works for highest prices in contemporary art market usually do produce such objects. This paradox is partialy resolved if you consider the fact that these artists always employ a staff of assistants, technicians, etc. – i.e. like everybody else they are making “projects” – only the collective nature of production in this case if concealed in favor of individual artists’ “brand names.”)

Although its highly social nature (people exchanging code, collaborating on projects together, treating audiences as equal participants, etc.) aligns “software art” with contemporary art, since it is firmly focused on its medium rather than medium-free concepts, “software art” cannot be considered “contemporary art.” This is one reason why it is indeed excluded by the art world. The logics of “contemporary art” and “digital art” are fundamentally at odds which each other, and I don’t see any easy way around this. So, for instance, when Ars Electronica program asks “In which direction is artists’ work with the new instruments like algorithms and dynamic systems transforming the process of artistic creativity?” (festival program, p. 9), the very assumptions behind such a question put it outside of the paradigm of contemporary art."

Lev Manovich

Don’t Call it Art: Ars Electronica 2003

Link: http://manovich.net/

what is it?


An Internet site looking for winning time (Auf der Suche nach der gewonnenen Zeit), http://www.lookingforwinningtime.info with a search engine allows every request to be turned into a picture box; the information is turned into a picture world, a decoration. (decoration being here defined as the non decipherable information being transferred accordingly into an abstract construction. A visual pattern is developed with a code as base). The project is an ongoing investigation about the common sense of visual communication as a tool to decipher or en-decipher messages. It pulls apart and constructs new versions of data and processes, how communication can be visualized with globally digitally accessible resources.

For the exhibition at the Rotunda Gallery, participants (students and others) use a number of riddles to be unraveled and some poems from "The Diwan" by the Persian poet Hafiz (14th Century or 8th Century A.H.]. They request selected words, which then are represented as boxes. Hundreds of assembled boxes are installed as architectural arrangement into the physical space.


Eventually one will not "discover" the original text. Nevertheless, the view of the installation functions like an impression of it. It might animate the viewers curiosity for either viewing the countless pictures, the architectural construction or enjoying fantasizing about their own interpretations, allowing approaches towards the development of patterns through media produced geometrical rhythmical figures.
...more.... > http://www.hannesbrunner.com/11


The exhibition is organized by the Guest Lecturers / Visiting Artists series of the Visual Communication Program


and promoted by the Swiss Arts Council